GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » R3BRoot » Data Analysis » Data levels in R3Broot - suggestion
Re: Data levels in R3Broot - suggestion [message #18915 is a reply to message #18907] Thu, 21 January 2016 11:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dmytro Kresan is currently offline  Dmytro Kresan
Messages: 166
Registered: June 2004
first-grade participant
From: 93.77.23*
Hi Ralf,

I fully agree to the scheme you have proposed.

We will not need "old" RawItem classes as soon as R3BRoot unpackers (3 or 4 existing) will be substituted by Ucesb Readers. But I would like to keep them for the transition period, so I will rename them to Unpack level.

Technical question, about the naming convention. For example, R3BNeulandHit and R3BNeulandDHit are self-informative. Do we need "Item" suffix for Mapped and Cal levels, something like R3BNeulandCalItem?

Cheers,
Dima
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: flag for different data structures
Next Topic: Channel / Crystal / Bar / Detector numbers
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 11 16:22:00 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00881 seconds