| Re: hyperon fast simualtions [message #16551 is a reply to message #16548] |
Thu, 08 May 2014 18:48   |
Karin Schönning
Messages: 65
Registered: August 2012
Location: Uppsala University
|
continuous participant |
From: *physics.uu.se
|
|
|
Apparently it is the "det_full" option that doesn't work. I understood from your talk that one should/could give that as argument when running with the full setup. When doing that I get bad results. Changing to "12345" gives better results. The aceptance is now the same order of magnitude as for simfast.C but actually a little better: 3.7% LLbar efficiency for simfast.C and 4.9% for simfast_opt.C. Full simulations with ideal pattern recognition gives 7%.
|
|
|
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
