Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Analysis » [FIXED] Mc Truth Match
| Re: Mc Truth Match [message #15316 is a reply to message #15315] |
Thu, 22 August 2013 18:57   |
MartinJGaluska
Messages: 203
Registered: March 2010
Location: Germany
|
first-grade participant |
From: *physik.uni-giessen.de
|
|
If I just rerun the analysis macro I see differences between
theAnalysis->FillList(mcpiplus,"PionLoosePlus","PidAlgoIdealCharged");
and
theAnalysis->FillList(mcpiplus,"PionTightPlus","PidAlgoIdealCharged");
For a simulations of 10k events simulated with the rho tutorial macros I get (in total) 3 piplus and 1 piminus more with "Loose" than with "Tight". 3 misidentified particles have PdgCode 1000010020 and 1 has 1000010030. PID probability arrays are 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 in all cases.
If I only simulate 1k such events, I get no differences.
For a simulations of 1k events of psi(4040) to D0 anti-D0 / D+ D- and all D decays allowed I get (in total) 3 piplus and 1 piminus more with "Loose" than with "Tight". All misidentified particles have PdgCode 1000010020 and PID probability arrays are 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
I will rerun all simulations starting from the simulation macro and check again, but that will take until tomorrow.
[EDIT: I have just noticed that I incremented the event counter twice per event, so the number of inspected events is only half of what I wrote above]
[Updated on: Fri, 23 August 2013 10:51] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Current Time: Tue Dec 03 19:01:13 CET 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00829 seconds
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
