GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Analysis » [WONTFIX] Tutorial macro - trunk
Analysis macro - trunk rev21003 [message #15257 is a reply to message #15145] Tue, 20 August 2013 13:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Elisabetta Prencipe (2) is currently offline  Elisabetta Prencipe (2)
Messages: 214
Registered: February 2013
first-grade participant
From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de
Dear all,

I am still running in the trunk rev-21003, with updated External Packages to the one provided for the apr13 release.

I run my sim-, digi-, reco-, pid- macro with only warnings, no crash on the analysis of Ds(2535). The warning on the missing ems modul n.8 in the digi process, still persists. When I run my analysis macro (which is something very easy) I got several times the following error message; it does not produce any crash, but I would like to have some clarifications. Here below I report the error message.
Did anybody find this before?
Thanks in advance for your useful help in understanding.
Best regards, Elisabetta

*********************
Error in <TDecompLU::InvertLU>: matrix is singular, 0 diag elements < tolerance of 2.2204e-16
Error in <TDecompLU::DecomposeLUCrout>: matrix is singular
Error in <TDecompLU::InvertLU>: matrix is singular, 0 diag elements < tolerance of 2.2204e-16
evt 3100
evt 3200
evt 3300
Error in <TDecompLU::DecomposeLUCrout>: matrix is singular
Error in <TDecompLU::InvertLU>: matrix is singular, 0 diag elements < tolerance of 2.2204e-16
Error in <TDecompLU::DecomposeLUCrout>: matrix is singular
Error in <TDecompLU::InvertLU>: matrix is singular, 0 diag elements < tolerance of 2.2204e-16
Error in <TDecompLU::DecomposeLUCrout>: matrix is singular
evt 3400
...
...
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [CLOSED] Wrong particle in FillList
Next Topic: [FIXED] RhoCandidate - probability connection ?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 11 06:08:36 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00524 seconds