GSI Forum: Bugs, Fixes, Releases » [FIXED] LmdFit does not compile on MAC

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » [FIXED] LmdFit does not compile on MAC

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC [message #14691 is a reply to message #14687]

Thu, 02 May 2013 16:39

Stefan Pflueger
Messages: 99
Registered: February 2012

continuous participant

From: *kph.uni-mainz.de

Hi Stefano,

sry for this... basically everything you describe is related to the fact that the mac compiler does not support c++11 standard yet and I wanted to use that standard as shared_ptr are in the std namespace (ok for the gnu compiler I needed the . But I will switch everything to use tr1 then it should compile just fine. If not I will jump back to the boost namespace.
Regarding the private/public problem: this compiles just fine for me, because I'm not actually using it just laying out the structure for the iterator.

I'll let you know when I commited the new version (prob in a few hours as I'm working on a rework aswell).

Best regards,

Stefan

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[FIXED] LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 02 May 2013 12:36
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Stefan Pflueger on Thu, 02 May 2013 16:39
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Florian Uhlig on Thu, 02 May 2013 16:47
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Stefan Pflueger on Thu, 02 May 2013 18:27
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 02 May 2013 18:32
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Stefan Pflueger on Fri, 03 May 2013 19:05
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Ralf Kliemt on Mon, 06 May 2013 09:16
		Re: LmdFit does not compile on MAC By: Stefan Pflueger on Mon, 06 May 2013 09:39

Previous Topic:	[FIXED] Error in running in macro runLumi2Reco.C
Next Topic:	[INFO] RHO Update done

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Dec 05 22:45:37 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00845 seconds