GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » [FIXED] Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts?
Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? [message #14594 is a reply to message #14592] Mon, 08 April 2013 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *vpn.unito.it
Hi Ralf,
I have done tests with the last trunk, and everything seems fine:

D+ invariant mass for all the combinations, ideal (blue) and real (red) tracking:

index.php?t=getfile&id=7330&private=0


and with pid selection using montecarlo truth of kaons and pions:

index.php?t=getfile&id=7331&private=0

Everything seems fine to me. I attach here the analysis macro I have used.

I have few comments to add.

I have used the following PndAnalysis constructor:

PndAnalysis* theAnalysis = new PndAnalysis("SttMvdGemGenTrack","FtsIdealGenTrack");


The system is not able to load them automatically, I think it should be stressed that one has to write the names of the TCAs. Not clear to me what is doing the code with the track objects.

I have tried to do the "mother" mc identification:

mcm.SetType(dplus,"D+");


It is not working, while it was worlking for the simple particles. Maybe I have done something wrong (could you please correct me?) or maybe there is some bug in the PndMcMatch for composite candidates.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [FIXED] Detector geometry is not visualized inside the FairBaseParSet Container
Next Topic: [FIXED] eventdisplay does not load on Fedora 18
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Apr 16 20:13:17 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01293 seconds