GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » General » the eta_c analysis presented yesterday by Dima
Re: the eta_c analysis presented yesterday by Dima [message #12430 is a reply to message #12428] Tue, 02 August 2011 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Dima Melnychuk is currently offline  Dima Melnychuk
Messages: 213
Registered: April 2004
Location: National Centre for Nucle...
first-grade participant
From: *fuw.edu.pl
Hi Stefano,

I compared macros I used locally for STT reconstruction with that on the grid and the only difference is latest update by Lia:
  PndMCTrackAssociator* trackMC0 = new PndMCTrackAssociator();
  trackMC0->SetTrackInBranchName("SttMvdTrack");
  trackMC0->SetTrackOutBranchName("SttMvdTrackID");
  trackMC0->SetPersistence(kFALSE);
  fRun->AddTask(trackMC0);

  PndSttMvdGemTracking * SttMvdGemTracking = new PndSttMvdGemTracking(0);
  SttMvdGemTracking->SetPdgFromMC();
  fRun->AddTask(SttMvdGemTracking);


plus added commented line by Gianluigi
// SttMvdTracking->Cleanup();

But I already tried with this line:
SttMvdGemTracking->SetPdgFromMC();
commented and it didn't cause any difference.

And in addition I just checked STT reconstruction with commented line
recoKalman->SetIdealHyp(kTRUE);

but difference is minor.


Dima

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Psi3770 study with run981 tpc mode
Next Topic: Lambda and Lambdabar channel
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 16 17:11:30 CEST 2022

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01272 seconds