Lia Lavezzi Messages: 291 Registered: May 2007 Location: Torino
first-grade participant
From: *21-151.libero.it
Quote:
Looking on the number of counts in eta_c peak with 80 vs 8000, I can add that number of analysed events is 2000 vs 100k. So drop of efficiency by factor 2 appears already on this level.
And concerning the error at lower statistics (calculating it as a square root of number of reconstructed eta_c) it' about 1%, i.e. 15+/-1 % vs 23%. So the numbers are not really compatible within errors, (may be it's just a matter of fluctuation).
Hi Dima,
you are right, considering these numbers I am also wondering if it is really just statistics. Let' s see what happens with more events.
Cheers,
Lia.
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
