Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » back-propagation with GEANE
| Re: back-propagation with GEANE [message #10721 is a reply to message #10715] |
Fri, 21 May 2010 10:45   |
Anastasia Karavdina
Messages: 76
Registered: May 2010
Location: Mainz, Germany
|
continuous participant |
From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
|
|
Hi Alberto and Lia,
Thank you for detailed explanation! I added requirement to save only the correctly propagated tracks, but it didn't change even number of events in my histograms.
About "significant":
First of all I'm interesting in knowledge of angle resolution,
so under "significant" I meant differences between simulated and reconstructed values of angles. I don't know how to correct compare them, but I see, that these differences much more bigger, then uncertainties, for example, due to multiple scattering in luminosity monitor. And also I can not explain shape of these differences (for example in angle phi).
In absence of magnetic field I expected differences between simulated and reconstructed values of angles equal to zero. Because I simulated tracks in vacuum inside beam pipe, so there is no any material and I expected obtain PCA equal to (0,0,0).
But you right if I compare differences between coordinates of PCA and momentum coordinates with GEANE errors for these variables it seems everything is fine (with the exception of case with zero errors). I would like to know what is the nature of this non-zero errors in absence of magnetic field? Is it only computing uncertainties?
I add plots for the same variables as in my first message in absence of magnetic field.
It's interesting that without magnetic field I don't have any peaks in zero for errors of momentum and PCA coordinates.
Anastasia.
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 05:48:01 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00911 seconds
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
