GSI Forum: Event Generators » New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Event Generators » New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations [message #10122 is a reply to message #10120]

Fri, 05 February 2010 17:07

StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino

first-grade participant

From: *to.infn.it

However,
PndDpmDirect does not propagate anymore this number, which is not so nice and must be fixed.
I am wondering which could be a good value for thetamin, and how much this can change the final results for elastic coulomb, to use it as default value instead of zero.
Do you have some idea on what could be used as default parameter?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Tue, 02 February 2010 17:55
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:14
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:38
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Tobias Stockmanns on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:48
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:53
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 10:33
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 11:07
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Sebastian Neubert on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:01
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:02
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:08
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 14:36
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 15:43
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Tobias Stockmanns on Fri, 05 February 2010 15:58
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 16:09
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 17:07
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Aida Galoyan on Fri, 05 February 2010 18:37

Previous Topic:	Random Seed of BoxGenerator
Next Topic:	UrQMD - SMM

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Sep 08 08:40:11 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00925 seconds