GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » Forward spectrometer tracking
Re: Forward spectrometer tracking [message #8742 is a reply to message #8739] Tue, 02 June 2009 15:43 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
donghee is currently offline  donghee
Messages: 385
Registered: January 2009
Location: Germnay
first-grade participant
From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
Dear Christian,

That is surely great idea!
I would be really happy, if I can join this subject and if there are no other argument. I will try to give some small contribution for the forward spectrometer tracking.

I would like to discuss dch and gem standalone tracking.
If I look and run dch tracking macro, i have very reasonable spectra. you can also find dch_mom.eps _theta.eps _resolution.eps
and xyview.eps, that are defined by dch tracking.
Blue one is reconstruced from dch tracking, red for generated one in one dimension plot.
x and y units in 2D plot are [m] meter.

But if I have tested gem alone, the result is changing dramatically. I have a look all hits information, which is prepared in GEM macro, most of hits are dedicated near the 0.5cm radius in 4 station GEM, however identified tracking in GEM are located far way at roughly 50cm.
As well as reconstruction efficiency are quite bad.
Roughly 20% events are only reconstruced in GEM stations.
I think that GEM has some problem in the tracking.

Could you confirm this?

Best wishes,
Donghee Kang from Mainz
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Fitter Exceptions
Next Topic: removed debug output
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 04 00:55:35 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00727 seconds