GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » GEM tracking
Re: GEM tracking [message #8364 is a reply to message #8362] Thu, 30 April 2009 18:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Anonymous Poster From: *e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de
Hi Radek,

I propose the following:

Please use the box generator, since in the beginning the momena of particles is important until you understand everything. Also, I would like to see what happens as a proof of principle of your recoHit implementation what happens if you change your geometry a little:

- Remove all other stuff from the setup
- make your GEMs much larger, so they will cover a higher theta acceptance
- use some more planes in between the ones you have.

If we make the reconstruction work in this scenario, then we can try to find out, why in the real case it doesnt work. I still suspect that you dont get enough bending to measure |p|.

Looking forward to hear about your tests...

Christian
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: change in genfit exception handling
Next Topic: GEM Tracking inside LHETRACK
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 16 22:50:47 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01026 seconds