Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation [message #8126 is a reply to message #8125] |
Fri, 20 March 2009 14:36 |
Anonymous Poster
|
|
From: *e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de
|
|
Hi Lia,
thanks a lot for the help in restructuring things. If you come up with something on the direction or want to discuss it, I am here....
I read again throught the argument about the difference in origin in STT and DCH. I understoof the difference now. In the STT you also have a measurement of the coordinate along the wire (by the way for curiosity: How do you plan doing that - charge sharing, timing on double sided readout?), and in the DCH case you dont have it.
But these are indeed two different things and I propose to have two policies for that.
WirepointHitPolicy for the STT
WireHitPolicy for the DCH
I guess the naming is self-explanatory. Lia, do you have write access in genfit? If so, could you implement your changed WirepoitHitPolicy and also the WireHitPolicy in which you put the code for Ola's choice of origin placement?
Then after that Ola could use WireHitPolicy and get rid of her own implementation of getDetPlane.
When we are done with this process, I will remove the virtual from getDetPlane in the RecoHitIfc to make this method non-overwriteable.
Lia, if I ask too much of you, please let me know and I will try to do some things as far as I can. Overall I think the process should be easy though.
Chers, Christian
|
|
|
|
|
WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 13:55
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 14:16
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 15:54
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 16:49
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 18:46
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:10
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 17 March 2009 18:23
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 11:51
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 13:37
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:26
|
|
|
Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:25
|
|
|
changes in PndDchKalmanQA
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:32
|
|
|
Re: changes in PndDchKalmanQA
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 16:13
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 17:21
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 14:11
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:54
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:56
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:57
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 14:36
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:18
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 20:28
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:32
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 23 March 2009 15:33
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 30 March 2009 16:21
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 01 April 2009 12:34
|
|
|
Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Sep 14 23:54:11 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00513 seconds
|