Home » CBM » CBMROOT » General » Release DEC08
Release DEC08: Standard geometry? [message #7593 is a reply to message #7590] |
Tue, 02 December 2008 09:51 |
Volker Friese
Messages: 365 Registered: April 2004 Location: GSI CBM
|
first-grade participant |
From: *gsi.de
|
|
Peter Senger recently criticised the concept of a "standard" geometry. Thus, I would like to trigger a discussion whether you consider this concept useful. I see the following pros and cons:
+ The user knows which default geometry to take for each subsystem, without having to know the details. This is the prime motivation for having a standard geometry at all.
- A "standard" is not well defined - at least, we have different geometries in the electron and muon setups.
- The standard geometry may change from release to release (e.g. STS switches from "hybrid (pixel+strips) to "allstrips"), without that being transparent for the user, as the file name stays the same.
What is your opinion?
[Updated on: Tue, 02 December 2008 09:53] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Sep 15 11:21:58 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00866 seconds
|