Re: new features in GENFIT [message #8901 is a reply to message #8900] |
Wed, 24 June 2009 15:01 |
Anonymous Poster
|
|
From: 129.187.154*
|
|
Hi Stefano,
thanks for your questions.
1) About not using FairTrackH in PndTrack:
You can refer back to the old forum entries about the problem, why I could not use the base class. It was discussed with Ralf/Tobias/Mohammad in Torino, that I believe that we do not need to save FairTrackParH in PndTrack. The reason is that hits in any detectors are always measured in RairTrackParP parametrization. So, if from LHE track you get something else, please use the conversion tools to convert to FairTrackParH.
2) We could make a PndTrack -> Track adapter. Could you maybe do that? Some help is very welcome and the more people get used to the stuff the better. If you have specific questions about it, I will be happy to help.
3) I want to solve the problem of all these several Kalman tasks everybody is writing. I want to have only one central task for that. I am thinking about how to do that in the moment...
Cheers, Christian
Cheers, Christian
|
|
|