| Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack() [message #8568 is a reply to message #8565] |
Thu, 14 May 2009 15:39   |
donghee
Messages: 385
Registered: January 2009
Location: Germnay
|
first-grade participant |
From: *dip.t-dialin.net
|
|
Dear stefano,
Concerning you mentioned...
OK, then I can simply expect more few % of energy loss in the each detector session.
| Quote: |
]without caring about materials and not costant field.
|
What is the meaning of "not constant field"?
There is a multiple magnet field, and lhetrack fitter use this field using map in the reco process. Is it correct?
Thank you for your plot,
There is two option with point and cluster for TPC case.
From your plot, I have learned that I need to go point mode for tpc and mvd to get more better resolution.
| Quote: |
trackMS->SetTpcMode(2); // 0 OFF, 1 TpcPoint, 2 TpcCluster // TpcPoint smearing [cm], if negative no smearing
trackMS->SetMvdMode(2); // 0 OFF, 1 MVDPoint, 2 MVDHit // MVDPoint smearing [cm], if negative no smearing
|
Could you explain what is the difference of point and hit?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
