GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » FutureDAQ » FutureDAQ - Networking » Custom vs. commodity networks
Re: Custom vs. commodity networks [message #586 is a reply to message #584] Tue, 15 June 2004 11:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Walter F.J. Müller is currently offline  Walter F.J. Müller
Messages: 229
Registered: December 2003
Location: GSI, CBM
first-grade participant

Is the final solution PLD based?
   The current working assumption is, that the first layer(s) are
   based on PLD's and that the final trigger decision is done in
   a CPU (which might be in PC).
What is the average/maximum distance between the processing units?
   In general, links connecting units on the detector as well as
   in the counting house will be 2-10 m, while links between
   detector and counting house will be significantly longer, say
   order 50m. Which ones are just point-to-point and or require a
   true network is one of the basic architecture questions.

W.F.J.Müller, GSI, CBM, Tel: 2766
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon3.gif
Next Topic: PCIe-AS - What are limitations on Network size ?
Goto Forum:

Current Time: Thu May 23 01:43:23 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01148 seconds