Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » Weird STT reconstruction: efficiency depends on charge
Re: Weird STT reconstruction: efficiency depends on charge [message #5703 is a reply to message #5693] |
Fri, 25 January 2008 17:01 |
Andrew Savchenko
Messages: 6 Registered: January 2008
|
occasional visitor |
From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de
|
|
Dear Pablo,
sorry for a long response, but I was busy a lot these days.
Pablo Genova wrote on Wed, 23 January 2008 17:07 |
So try to svn-update the PndSttHelixTrackFitter and do again the reconstruction.
|
Yes, this works thank you very much.
Quote: |
Other observations:
->cross check of the variables
1. fParamLast.fTx*0.006 <--------> transverse momentum
[i. e. cbmsim->Draw("(fParamLast.fTx*0.006)"]
2.fParamLast.fTx*0.006*sqrt(1+fParamLast.fTy**2)) <------> total momentum
Do you agree?
|
Yes, I do. This is mathematically equivalent to what I'm using now.
Quote: |
->importance of fFlag==3 parameter
when you are looking at total reco, to get the only the events with the full reconstruction succeeded do like this:
cbmsim->Draw("(fParamLast.fTx*0.006)>>h2","fFlag==3")
in this way you select the events with fFlag==3 i. e. full success of the whole reconstructed procedure.
|
Yes, this helps. But not absolutely. Even with a check for (GetFlag() == 3) I still can see this false peak at 90 degrees, but it become much smaller.
Quote: |
It's certainly an interesting and not yet done study that of STT resolution at small theta angles, with or without MVD.
MVD + STT integration is also an interesting issue not yet tackled.
|
Yeah, this should be investigated indeed, but later. Currently I will be out of work for several months due to technical reasons.
Quote: |
If you need better explanation of the variables and the fitting procedure etc etc I can send you the presentations I made in the past and Lia's Phd Thesis (which, among other things, describes in detail the algorithm).
|
OK, this will be useful, but later
Andrew
[Updated on: Fri, 25 January 2008 17:02] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 04 22:46:47 CET 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00856 seconds
|