GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » Stepsize in TPC Simulation with new external packages
Re: Stepsize in TPC Simulation with new external packages [message #5585 is a reply to message #5492] Fri, 14 December 2007 08:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Mohammad Al-Turany is currently offline  Mohammad Al-Turany
Messages: 518
Registered: April 2004
Location: GSI, Germany
first-grade participant
From: *gsi.de
Hallo,

In fact if I understand it well, you rigester in your proccess hit the Edep and flength for each step, and you draw this with the tree draw? if this is true then there is two problems with your plots:

1. Edep is the energy deposition in the volume and not the energy loss! Energy loss and energy deposition in a layer are not necessary equal, because of possible energy leak from the volume. Also you use low cuts, then significant part of energy loss is the production of delta-electrons which need to be counted.

2. fLength: is the track length and not the step length,

if this is true then one can understand your plot, the change in energy deposition (gas in your case)is much smaller than the track length when you change the step size and so with larger steps the whole distribution goes down.

So may be you can register the energy loss instead of deposited energy, which means you have to register the initial energy of your particle at entering a step and the final (at exiting). You need also to set the cuts back! We use usually 50 keV for delta electron production. and 1 MeV for all other.

regards

Mohammad
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: New release of external packages
Next Topic: Bugs with tpc in rel. 2006
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 28 15:18:03 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00742 seconds