GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » FutureDAQ » FutureDAQ - Simulation » Ptolemy II perfomance
Re: SystemC versus Ptolemy II perfomance [message #386 is a reply to message #385] Wed, 28 April 2004 16:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ivan Kisel is currently offline  Ivan Kisel
Messages: 68
Registered: March 2004
Location: KIP, Uni-Heidelberg, Germ...
continuous participant
From: *kip.uni-heidelberg.de
Dear Sergei,

I don't expect that Ptolemy will be faster than SystemC.

My statement is that Ptolemy with his graphical interface vergil is more suitable for developing, debugging and investigating the design. SystemC has no graphical interface. This will result in your/my/our time, not CPU, when you start creating large complicated systems, but not simply increasing number of actors.

Ivan.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Ptolemy Classic
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 19 12:10:01 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01185 seconds