GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung
Home » R3BRoot » Simulation Issues » Question on R3BNeutronTracker2D (Question on R3BNeutronTracker2D)
Re: Question on R3BNeutronTracker2D [message #19366 is a reply to message #19365] Thu, 07 July 2016 17:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
C. A. Douma is currently offline  C. A. Douma
Messages: 88
Registered: September 2015
Location: Groningen
continuous participant
 From: *kvi-cart.rug.nl
If I manually add signal neutrons, I cannot observe the realistic case.
Both the probability for a reaction and the probability for background from the unreacted beam are small and
of comparable size. This is why the background causes trouble. If I manually add signal neutrons
to the unreacted beam, the suddenly the signals are so much stronger then the background that the VETO does
more harm then good: if I have for example 0.5% background and 1.5% of the neutrons is detected by the VETO, the VETO will
never help us. But if I have 0.5% background and 0.5% neutrons, then the VETO only blocks 1.5% of 0.5%. Then it might work.

This is also the reason why I asked you about the TGeant4 physics list. I need to really produce the neutrons from a simulated
reaction and I need to take the unreacted beam along to produce the background. And according to Ken Miki, TGeant3 cannot
do this target collisions.

But when I do add these signal neutrons, the tracker works fine, also with the beta test.

Christiaan.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Tracking energy cut
Next Topic: Tracks on Event Display
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 05:08:03 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01785 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home :: Legal Notice :: Data Protection Policy ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.1.2.
Copyright ©2001-2022 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software