GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Analysis » hyperon fast simualtions
Re: hyperon fast simualtions [message #16551 is a reply to message #16548] Thu, 08 May 2014 18:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Karin Schönning
Messages: 65
Registered: August 2012
Location: Uppsala University
continuous participant
From: *physics.uu.se
Apparently it is the "det_full" option that doesn't work. I understood from your talk that one should/could give that as argument when running with the full setup. When doing that I get bad results. Changing to "12345" gives better results. The aceptance is now the same order of magnitude as for simfast.C but actually a little better: 3.7% LLbar efficiency for simfast.C and 4.9% for simfast_opt.C. Full simulations with ideal pattern recognition gives 7%.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Differences between Histo and Ntuple
Next Topic: McTruthMatch problems
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 15 10:36:55 CEST 2019

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02820 seconds