GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » segmentation violation in FairPrimaryGenerator
Re: segmentation violation in FairPrimaryGenerator [message #14039 is a reply to message #14038] Mon, 01 October 2012 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Anastasia Karavdina is currently offline  Anastasia Karavdina
Messages: 76
Registered: May 2010
Location: Mainz, Germany
continuous participant

From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
Ok. in meanwhile I recompile pandaroot and tried your suggestion about magnetic field usages and so on together with stand alone DPM version. It works, without any problem!
But if I use PndDpmDirect instead (basicly macro runLumi0DPMbkgSte) I have following log from GDB:
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x00007ffff04a1552 in dpm_event (nhad=0) at /home/karavdin/pandaRoot12/pgenerators/DpmEvtGen/dpm_gen.f:334
334             SumPz=SumPz/float(Nhad)
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install expat-2.0.1-9.1.el6.x86_64 fontconfig-2.8.0-3.el6.x86_64 freetype-2.3.11-6.el6_0.2.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-4.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.8.2-3.el6_0.7.x86_64 libX11-1.3-2.el6.x86_64 libXau-1.0.5-1.el6.x86_64 libXcursor-1.1.10-2.el6.x86_64 libXext-1.1-3.el6.x86_64 libXfixes-4.0.4-1.el6.x86_64 libXft-2.1.13-4.1.el6.x86_64 libXpm-3.5.8-2.el6.x86_64 libXrender-0.9.5-1.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-7.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-2.el6.x86_64 libxcb-1.5-1.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0-4.el6_0.2.x86_64 pcre-7.8-3.1.el6.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-25.el6.x86_64
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff04a1552 in dpm_event (nhad=0) at /home/karavdin/pandaRoot12/pgenerators/DpmEvtGen/dpm_gen.f:334
#1  0x00007ffff049ff51 in dpm_gen (pluto=0, seed=50891) at /home/karavdin/pandaRoot12/pgenerators/DpmEvtGen/dpm_gen.f:13
#2  0x00007fffec7deb57 in PndDpmDirect::ReadEvent (this=0x1731f50
../../gdb/stack.c:289: internal-error: print_frame_args: Assertion `nsym != NULL' failed.


Well, here I should admit that I use DPM code with corrections done by Stefan Pflueger which is not in trunk yet. But I'm still surprise to see how different DPM works as a stand alone compiled version.
I guess it's difficult to dig up the problem until DPM code will be in SVN.
Once again, thank you for your help, Stefano.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: segmentation violation in reco macro(PndSttMvdTracking)
Next Topic: [FIXED] version mismatch at libgeant321.so
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 21:43:30 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01072 seconds