GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » eta_c reconstruction efficiency
Re: eta_c reconstruction efficiency [message #12732 is a reply to message #12724] Wed, 19 October 2011 18:07 Go to previous message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *to.infn.it
Dear all,
I have started also to investigate the problem of the eta_c efficiency loss.
For this I have run the simulation chain up to SttMvdTracking, w/o genfit, using the trnk PndSttMvdracking.* and comparing with the july11 version.
The followings are the invariant mass distributions for eta_c and phi, with trunk and july11:

index.php?t=getfile&id=6693&private=0index.php?t=getfile&id=6696&private=0

You can see there are no differences.

After, I run the same but also genfit:

index.php?t=getfile&id=6694&private=0index.php?t=getfile&id=6697&private=0

Here the difference is evident, even if the kalman code is exactly the same for the two options.

I suspected it was connected with the montecarlo id hypothesis of the mctrackassociator, and I have run genfit using the standard muon hyp:

index.php?t=getfile&id=6695&private=0index.php?t=getfile&id=6698&private=0

The same. The problem does not depend on the mc id part.

My guess:
the STTMVD pattern recognition part is fine, it provides nice peaks w/o the kalman. The kalman does some mess with the latest code. Considering that the kalman starts from the track parameters at the first point (which should be fine according to the first plots) and from the trackcand, I suspect that in the latter SttMvdTracking there is some mess with the TrackCand object.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: some options for eta_c analysis
Next Topic: track quality criterion
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jul 15 07:04:38 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00821 seconds