GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » Memory leaks in digitization (TPC!)
Re: Crash in TPC digitization [message #11119 is a reply to message #11111] Mon, 25 October 2010 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *ihep.ac.cn
Hi,
unfortunately my DPM simulation has crashed, then I have to regenerate again the files to test your changes.
Meanwhile, I have tried to run muons, and I got no crash... but muons are easier to handle.

Running valgrind, I have seen still the following leak:

==18001== 10,082,772 bytes in 546,990 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 451 of 455
==18001==    at 0x4004790: operator new(unsigned) (vg_replace_malloc.c:164)
==18001==    by 0xC17971: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned, unsigned, std::allocator<char> co
nst&) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3)
==18001==    by 0xC19DF4: (within /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3)
==18001==    by 0xC19F01: std::string::string(char const*, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/l
ib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3)
==18001==    by 0x9947B5D: padprocessor::reset() (TORPadProcessor.cxx:99)
==18001==    by 0x994D4C2: PndTpcSectorProcessor::reset() (PndTpcSectorProcessor.cxx:187)
==18001==    by 0x9932E20: PndTpcClusterFinder::process(std::vector<PndTpcDigi*, std::allocator<Pn
dTpcDigi*> >&) (PndTpcClusterFinder.cxx:122)
==18001==    by 0x99415EB: PndTpcClusterFinderTask::Exec(char const*) (PndTpcClusterFinderTask.cxx
:151)
==18001==    by 0x4193924: TTask::ExecuteTasks(char const*) (in /home/spataro/jan10/tools/root/lib
/libCore.so.5.26)
==18001==    by 0x4193720: TTask::ExecuteTask(char const*) (in /home/spataro/jan10/tools/root/lib/
libCore.so.5.26)
==18001==    by 0x90140B7: FairRunAna::Run(int, int) (FairRunAna.cxx:278)
==18001==    by 0x905995D: G__FairDict_792_0_5(G__value*, char const*, G__param*, int) (FairDict.c
xx:11420)


the last one from the old series I have reported some time ago. I think it should be also taken out.
I will let you know once the dpm simulation will end.
 
Read Message icon4.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: FairMCPoint trackID vs FairLink trackID.
Next Topic: [fixed] cmake bug in EvtGen
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 28 16:29:59 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00816 seconds