GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

  plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 10:23
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 23 February 2010 10:36
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 10:53
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 23 February 2010 12:04
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 12:28
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 11:07
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 23 February 2010 10:47
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 10:57
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 23 February 2010 11:29
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 11:45
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:45
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:48
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:06
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:11
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:59
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 23 February 2010 18:06
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 23 February 2010 18:20
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 23 February 2010 21:28
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Wed, 24 February 2010 08:12
  <more>
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 23 February 2010 18:00
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 23 February 2010 20:48
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 24 February 2010 12:47
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:56
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 23 February 2010 11:51
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 11:58
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 23 February 2010 12:12
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Gianluigi Boca on Tue, 23 February 2010 15:31
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 15:41
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Gianluigi Boca on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:03
  Re: plane id in track candidate
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:15
  Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: David Pohl on Wed, 10 February 2010 19:21
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 10 February 2010 21:05
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Gianluigi Boca on Wed, 10 February 2010 23:18
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Johan Messchendorp on Wed, 10 February 2010 23:49
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 00:21
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Johan Messchendorp on Thu, 11 February 2010 00:30
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 07:47
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Johan Messchendorp on Thu, 11 February 2010 09:47
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 10:05
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: David Pohl on Thu, 11 February 2010 10:43
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 11:05
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: David Pohl on Thu, 11 February 2010 11:15
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 11:20
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 February 2010 12:49
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: David Pohl on Thu, 11 February 2010 14:22
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: asanchez on Thu, 11 February 2010 14:34
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: asanchez on Thu, 11 February 2010 14:49
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 11 February 2010 15:19
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: asanchez on Thu, 11 February 2010 15:35
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 11 February 2010 15:46
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Alberto Rotondi on Thu, 11 February 2010 18:51
  Re: Momentum resolution and reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: Gianluigi Boca on Sat, 13 February 2010 23:06
  Lhetrack is now "old stuff" ?
By: Ronald Kunne on Fri, 12 February 2010 14:25
  Re: Lhetrack is now "old stuff" ?
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 12 February 2010 15:09
  Re: Lhetrack is now "old stuff" ?
By: Jens Sören Lange on Fri, 12 February 2010 16:40
icon4.gif Genfit Reco Hits
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 15:10
  Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 02 February 2010 17:50
  Re: Global Problems
By: Jens Sören Lange on Tue, 02 February 2010 18:16
  Re: Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 February 2010 11:49
  Re: Global Problems
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 03 February 2010 12:17
  Re: Global Problems
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 03 February 2010 12:27
  Re: Global Problems
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 03 February 2010 13:52
  Re: Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 February 2010 14:02
  Re: Global Problems
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:09
  Re: Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:31
  Re: Global Problems
By: Gianluigi Boca on Wed, 03 February 2010 22:10
  Re: Global Problems
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 03 February 2010 13:39
  Re: Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 February 2010 13:45
  Re: Global Problems
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 03 February 2010 14:09
  Re: Global Problems
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 02 February 2010 19:20
  Re: Global Problems
By: Johan Messchendorp on Tue, 02 February 2010 23:13
  Re: Global Problems
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 02 February 2010 23:35
  Re: Global Problems
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 February 2010 14:12
  Re: Global Problems
By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:46
  fDetectorType
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 03 February 2010 18:41
  Restructuring of Tracking Code
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 06 October 2009 22:54
  Place for Reco Hits
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 02 October 2009 11:37
  Re: Place for Reco Hits
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 02 October 2009 12:18
  Re: Place for Reco Hits
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 02 October 2009 12:56
  Re: Place for Reco Hits
By: Mohammad Al-Turany on Fri, 02 October 2009 13:20
  Recotask?
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 17 September 2009 14:46
  Re: Recotask?
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 29 September 2009 11:31
  Rate capability of DCH tracker
By: donghee on Thu, 23 July 2009 12:01
  Re: Rate capability of DCH tracker
By: donghee on Tue, 11 August 2009 10:47
  PndMicroCandidate
By: I. Atar on Fri, 07 August 2009 14:44
  Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: donghee on Wed, 29 July 2009 12:55
  Re: Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 29 July 2009 13:07
  Re: Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: donghee on Wed, 29 July 2009 14:04
  Re: Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 30 July 2009 16:05
  Re: Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: donghee on Mon, 03 August 2009 13:52
  Re: Reconstruction efficiency of LHE tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 03 August 2009 15:06
  GEM 'realistic' track finding
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 30 July 2009 15:38
  Re: GEM 'realistic' track finding
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 30 July 2009 16:08
  PndTrack and LheTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 25 June 2009 01:48
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: Mohammad Al-Turany on Thu, 25 June 2009 15:36
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 25 June 2009 16:02
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 29 June 2009 17:02
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 29 June 2009 18:35
  PndTrackID
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 01 July 2009 18:51
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: I. Atar on Tue, 28 July 2009 15:59
  Re: PndTrack and LheTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 28 July 2009 16:31
  point of closest approach
By: I. Atar on Wed, 22 July 2009 16:08
  Re: point of closest approach
By: Sebastian Neubert on Wed, 22 July 2009 16:31
  Re: point of closest approach
By: I. Atar on Thu, 23 July 2009 11:43
  Re: point of closest approach
By: I. Atar on Fri, 24 July 2009 18:19
  Re: point of closest approach
By: Sebastian Neubert on Mon, 27 July 2009 11:03
  Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 22 July 2009 17:37
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: Alberto Rotondi on Thu, 23 July 2009 10:24
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 23 July 2009 13:00
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: Gianluigi Boca on Thu, 23 July 2009 13:44
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 23 July 2009 15:45
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: Gianluigi Boca on Thu, 23 July 2009 18:15
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 23 July 2009 18:26
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 23 July 2009 19:41
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 23 July 2009 20:04
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 23 July 2009 22:02
  Re: Helix and FairTrackParH
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 24 July 2009 13:18
  Event Display and PndTrack
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 22 July 2009 17:45
  Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 13 July 2009 11:54
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 13 July 2009 12:20
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 13 July 2009 13:33
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 13 July 2009 14:06
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 13 July 2009 14:33
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Alberto Rotondi on Mon, 13 July 2009 16:01
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 14 July 2009 09:55
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 14 July 2009 10:57
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 14 July 2009 14:03
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 14 July 2009 14:23
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 14 July 2009 15:10
  Re: Conversion of track parameters
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 15 July 2009 16:42
  new features in GENFIT
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 24 June 2009 12:13
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 24 June 2009 12:44
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 24 June 2009 15:01
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 29 June 2009 13:07
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 29 June 2009 13:17
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 29 June 2009 15:09
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 29 June 2009 15:20
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 29 June 2009 15:35
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 29 June 2009 17:04
  Re: new features in GENFIT
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 29 June 2009 17:44
  GEM Tracking inside LHETRACK
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 22 June 2009 22:20
  Re: GEM Tracking inside LHETRACK
By: Ralf Kliemt on Fri, 26 June 2009 16:56
  GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 14 April 2009 13:09
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 14 April 2009 17:51
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 14 April 2009 18:06
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 15 April 2009 11:47
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 15 April 2009 13:01
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 15 April 2009 16:03
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 27 April 2009 11:56
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Tue, 28 April 2009 18:11
  Re: GEM tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 28 April 2009 18:22
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 29 April 2009 09:55
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 29 April 2009 11:51
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 30 April 2009 11:55
  Re: GEM tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 30 April 2009 12:11
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 30 April 2009 12:12
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 30 April 2009 15:52
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 30 April 2009 18:26
  Re: GEM tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 04 June 2009 18:10
  <more>
  change in genfit exception handling
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 16 June 2009 15:18
  still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Sat, 11 April 2009 16:49
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 16 April 2009 11:49
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 17 April 2009 10:44
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 20 April 2009 16:09
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 20 April 2009 16:21
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 20 April 2009 16:45
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 24 April 2009 14:22
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 27 April 2009 19:16
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 28 April 2009 16:41
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 30 April 2009 12:19
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 04 May 2009 12:06
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 04 May 2009 13:37
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Mohammad Al-Turany on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:57
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Johan Messchendorp on Mon, 04 May 2009 21:41
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 05 May 2009 09:49
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 05 May 2009 13:29
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 05 May 2009 14:00
  Re: still trouble with Geane
By: Johan Messchendorp on Tue, 05 May 2009 18:00
  Re: patch for Geane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 12 June 2009 16:23
  Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 04 June 2009 19:58
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Fri, 05 June 2009 09:13
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 05 June 2009 09:40
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 11 June 2009 09:57
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Ralf Kliemt on Thu, 11 June 2009 11:07
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 11 June 2009 11:27
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Ralf Kliemt on Thu, 11 June 2009 11:54
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 11 June 2009 13:46
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Sebastian Neubert on Thu, 11 June 2009 19:52
  Re: Adapter from Genfit to Pnd objects checked in
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 11 June 2009 20:17
  removed debug output
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 05 June 2009 10:08
  Re: removed debug output
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 June 2009 11:22
  Re: removed debug output
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 05 June 2009 11:35
  Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Tue, 02 June 2009 14:13
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 02 June 2009 14:25
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 02 June 2009 15:04
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Thu, 04 June 2009 19:30
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Tue, 02 June 2009 15:11
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 02 June 2009 15:33
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Thu, 04 June 2009 13:29
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 04 June 2009 17:33
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Tue, 02 June 2009 15:43
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Wed, 03 June 2009 16:03
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Wed, 03 June 2009 16:40
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: Radoslaw Karabowicz on Thu, 04 June 2009 17:44
  Re: Forward spectrometer tracking
By: donghee on Thu, 04 June 2009 18:18
  Fitter Exceptions
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Thu, 04 June 2009 14:35
  Re: Fitter Exceptions
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 04 June 2009 14:56
  Re: Fitter Exceptions
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Thu, 04 June 2009 16:05
  Re: Fitter Exceptions
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 04 June 2009 16:47
  Inconsistency geant3/gcons/gpart.F and TGean3.cxx
By: asanchez on Thu, 14 May 2009 16:50
  Re: Inconsistency geant3/gcons/gpart.F and TGean3.cxx
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 18 May 2009 12:07
  GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Mon, 25 May 2009 11:34
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 25 May 2009 11:51
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Mon, 25 May 2009 12:23
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 25 May 2009 12:15
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Mon, 25 May 2009 12:27
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 27 May 2009 10:32
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Wed, 27 May 2009 11:16
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 27 May 2009 12:12
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Wed, 27 May 2009 12:39
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 27 May 2009 23:55
  Re: GenaeTrackRep DetPlane
By: asanchez on Thu, 28 May 2009 18:23
  LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Wed, 13 May 2009 11:03
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 13 May 2009 14:05
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Wed, 13 May 2009 15:14
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 13 May 2009 17:50
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Wed, 13 May 2009 19:06
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 13 May 2009 20:10
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Thu, 14 May 2009 10:22
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Thu, 14 May 2009 16:09
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 18 May 2009 00:51
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 18 May 2009 08:30
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Mon, 18 May 2009 11:07
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Mon, 18 May 2009 11:12
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 18 May 2009 13:45
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: asanchez on Mon, 18 May 2009 15:07
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 18 May 2009 15:28
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Ralf Kliemt on Mon, 18 May 2009 15:38
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 18 May 2009 15:59
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 18 May 2009 18:20
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 18 May 2009 19:26
  Re: LSLTrackrep covariances are zero
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 27 May 2009 12:16
  Dch tracking in forward spectrometer
By: donghee on Sun, 24 May 2009 17:15
  Re: Dch tracking in forward spectrometer
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Mon, 25 May 2009 08:35
  General question for tracking
By: donghee on Tue, 19 May 2009 14:06
  Re: General question for tracking
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 19 May 2009 14:49
  Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: donghee on Thu, 14 May 2009 11:04
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 14 May 2009 14:43
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: donghee on Thu, 14 May 2009 14:55
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 14 May 2009 14:58
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: donghee on Thu, 14 May 2009 15:39
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 14 May 2009 16:01
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: donghee on Thu, 14 May 2009 16:38
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 18 May 2009 08:34
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: donghee on Thu, 14 May 2009 15:05
  Re: Question about PndLhePidTrack()
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 14 May 2009 15:26
  GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 05 May 2009 10:24
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 05 May 2009 10:34
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 05 May 2009 10:38
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Alberto Rotondi on Wed, 06 May 2009 19:16
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 12 May 2009 12:55
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 13 May 2009 14:08
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 13 May 2009 15:50
  Re: GEANE on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 13 May 2009 16:38
  Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 29 April 2009 14:05
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 29 April 2009 14:50
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 29 April 2009 15:24
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: asanchez on Thu, 30 April 2009 10:35
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 30 April 2009 11:22
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Bertram Kopf on Thu, 30 April 2009 13:43
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 30 April 2009 13:54
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Mohammad Al-Turany on Thu, 30 April 2009 23:10
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 01 May 2009 01:33
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Johan Messchendorp on Fri, 01 May 2009 16:01
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 01 May 2009 16:40
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 01 May 2009 18:08
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 08 May 2009 16:43
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 01 May 2009 16:36
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Ralf Kliemt on Fri, 08 May 2009 17:09
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Sebastian Neubert on Fri, 08 May 2009 19:41
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 11 May 2009 11:39
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Mon, 11 May 2009 11:43
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 11 May 2009 11:48
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Mon, 11 May 2009 12:42
  Re: Strategy discussion on Track objects
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:02
  TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: Marius Mertens on Tue, 28 April 2009 14:10
  Re: TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 28 April 2009 14:24
  Re: TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: Marius Mertens on Tue, 28 April 2009 14:51
  Re: TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 28 April 2009 15:05
  Re: TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: Marius Mertens on Tue, 28 April 2009 15:37
  Re: TrackCand dip treatment where Theta > 90°
By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 28 April 2009 15:39
  Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 06 March 2009 17:30
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 06 March 2009 17:38
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 09 March 2009 21:28
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 10 March 2009 10:26
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 10 March 2009 16:30
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 10 March 2009 16:43
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 10 March 2009 17:14
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 10 March 2009 18:03
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 10 March 2009 19:25
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 09 April 2009 18:11
  Re: Question on GeaneTrackRep.
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 10 March 2009 11:15
  Good News
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 09 April 2009 14:45
  Re: Good News
By: Johan Messchendorp on Thu, 09 April 2009 17:53
  Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 31 March 2009 15:00
  Re: Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 02 April 2009 22:16
  Re: Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Mohammad Al-Turany on Thu, 02 April 2009 22:32
  Re: Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Sebastian Neubert on Fri, 03 April 2009 11:18
  Re: Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Tobias Stockmanns on Mon, 06 April 2009 09:50
  Re: Please remove code in PndTools/riemannfit/PndRiemannTrackFinder.cxx
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 06 April 2009 10:07
  genfit LGPL
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 06 March 2009 23:21
  Re: genfit LGPL
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 02 April 2009 16:51
  WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 13:55
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 14:16
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 15:42
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 15:54
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 16:16
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 16:49
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 18:31
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 18:46
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 19:09
  new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolic...
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:10
  Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitP...
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 17 March 2009 18:13
  Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitP...
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 17 March 2009 18:23
  Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitP...
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 11:51
  Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitP...
By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 18 March 2009 13:23
  <more>
  <more>
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 17 March 2009 10:21
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 17 March 2009 11:34
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 17 March 2009 11:53
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:25
  changes in PndDchKalmanQA
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:32
  Re: changes in PndDchKalmanQA
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 16:13
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 17:21
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 19 March 2009 13:35
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 14:11
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:42
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:54
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:56
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:57
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 20 March 2009 12:58
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 14:36
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:11
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:18
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 20:28
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:32
  <more>
  <more>
  Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation
By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:55
  Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 31 March 2009 15:26
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Felix Boehmer on Tue, 31 March 2009 16:16
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: asanchez on Tue, 31 March 2009 17:06
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 31 March 2009 16:19
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 31 March 2009 16:47
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 31 March 2009 17:21
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Sebastian Neubert on Tue, 31 March 2009 18:02
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 31 March 2009 23:15
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 01 April 2009 00:19
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 01 April 2009 00:25
  Re: Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 01 April 2009 00:27
Goto Forum:
  
Legend New Messages New Messages   No New messages No New messages   Locked (w/ unread messages) Locked (w/ unread messages)   Locked Locked   Moved to another forum Moved to another forum

Current Time: Fri Jun 21 12:09:26 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01791 seconds