GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » Eta_c efficiency
Eta_c efficiency [message #12809] Fri, 25 November 2011 19:20 Go to next message
Gianluigi Boca is currently offline  Gianluigi Boca
Messages: 177
Registered: March 2004
first-grade participant
From: *gsi.de
Hi,
I modified again PndSttMvdTracking.cxx in order to get the 'old'
efficiency level, as in July11 release, for the Eta_c channel.
The difference, as anticipated, was a stricter cut on the association of the Parallel STT hits.
Please analyzers update and try again at your convenience

Tschuess Gianluigi
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12810 is a reply to message #12809] Sun, 27 November 2011 23:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dima Melnychuk is currently offline  Dima Melnychuk
Messages: 213
Registered: April 2004
Location: National Centre for Nucle...
first-grade participant
From: *play-internet.pl
Hi,
I just want to quote two numbers concerning eta_c reconstruction efficiency I obtained with 1000 events statistics.
Before the last modification I obtained 28.4% after it 30.9%, so indeed it improves additionally reconstruction efficiency.
Both numbers are for the same data set.

It's still a question how those numbers changes with higher statistics.

Dima
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12812 is a reply to message #12809] Mon, 28 November 2011 12:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dima Melnychuk is currently offline  Dima Melnychuk
Messages: 213
Registered: April 2004
Location: National Centre for Nucle...
first-grade participant
From: *fuw.edu.pl
Hi,

Just an additional number for eta_c efficiency.

For the data produced on grid without latest update I have eta_c reconstruction efficiency 23.5% with analysed 70.000 events.

Somehow with the grid data I have efficiency lower than with data produced by myself (28.4%). And it's not the first time I observe this behaviour.

Dima
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12816 is a reply to message #12812] Mon, 28 November 2011 16:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *30-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it
Could you please check if some subjob has 0 entries in the tree? Maybe there are some empty files, maybe...
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12817 is a reply to message #12816] Mon, 28 November 2011 17:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dima Melnychuk is currently offline  Dima Melnychuk
Messages: 213
Registered: April 2004
Location: National Centre for Nucle...
first-grade participant
From: *fuw.edu.pl
Event if there are files which has 0 entries in the tree it would not change the efficiency which I quote since I normalise for the actual number of entries, at least if it is obtained correctly from:

PndEventReader evr(inPidFile);
nevts=evr.GetEntries();
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12818 is a reply to message #12817] Mon, 28 November 2011 17:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *30-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it
Considering that the efficiency is something like 20%, there should be no empty files. In such a case, maybe the reconstruction macros had some problems and have created a tree with no entry, without giving an error. The subjob is simply failing and it should not be counted in the 70000 statistics.
But I don't know if this can happen.
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12827 is a reply to message #12809] Tue, 29 November 2011 14:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dima Melnychuk is currently offline  Dima Melnychuk
Messages: 213
Registered: April 2004
Location: National Centre for Nucle...
first-grade participant
From: *fuw.edu.pl
Hi,

With the latest STT reconstruction update the following results are obtained for eta_c channel with data produced on grid.

run926 (99500 events, copy of one file (500 events) fails)
Invariant mass distribution:
index.php?t=getfile&id=6732&private=0
Reconstruction efficiency - 25.8%, result is good but again somehow lower than I obtained with 1000 events (30.9%)
sigma(eta_c)=31.6 MeV, sigma(phi)=3.87 MeV

With cleanup - run926cu
index.php?t=getfile&id=6733&private=0
Efficiency drops to 18.1%, but still is reasonable.
sigma(eta_c)=28.7 MeV, sigma(phi)=3.70 MeV

And here are the multiplicities of charged tracks, without and with cleanup:
index.php?t=getfile&id=6734&private=0
index.php?t=getfile&id=6735&private=0

So I still try to understand why on grid efficiency is lower than I have locally, but otherwise data look reasonable.

Dima
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12828 is a reply to message #12827] Tue, 29 November 2011 15:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gianluigi Boca is currently offline  Gianluigi Boca
Messages: 177
Registered: March 2004
first-grade participant
From: *gsi.de
Hi Dima,
is the 'cleanup' result obtained with the DPM Background or not yet ?
Gianluigi
Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12829 is a reply to message #12828] Tue, 29 November 2011 15:54 Go to previous message
StefanoSpataro is currently offline  StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino
first-grade participant

From: *10-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it
Without
Previous Topic: eta_c reconstruction efficiency
Next Topic: Deterministic Annealing Filter and Kalman
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 29 23:34:46 CEST 2022

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01085 seconds