Need of a preamplifier [message #721] |
Fri, 06 August 2004 19:19 |
Chilo Garabatos
Messages: 12 Registered: August 2004 Location: GSI
|
occasional visitor |
From: lxial22.gsi.de
|
|
I am of the opinion that one should use a preamplifier (connected to the anodes through a capacitor) for testing the chambers, at least for measuring the absolute gain (by counting X-ray signals and recording the current at the same time).
In addition, it looks to me that being able to look at the signals on the scope would be of great benefict for debuging purposes: the behaviour of the X-ray tube, the observation of possible discharges due to dust, whether the gain non-uniformity is due to noise or not, etc.
What do you think?
Regards,
Chilo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Need of a preamplifier [message #737 is a reply to message #732] |
Tue, 10 August 2004 13:28 |
Sascha Freuen
Messages: 9 Registered: August 2004 Location: Heidelberg PI
|
occasional visitor |
From: *kip.uni-heidelberg.de
|
|
Dear Harry
Harald Appelshaeuser wrote on Tue, 10 August 2004 10:39 | I am not quite sure though whether I understood everything correctly: after you reached the nominal voltages the current was low (~ 5 nA) except for three excursions which reached the trip limit, is this correct?
|
Thats correct
Harald Appelshaeuser wrote on Tue, 10 August 2004 10:39 | I think the 'eruption' may well be due to a burning piece of dust. It lasted for an hour or so, right?
|
Yes it lasted for ~75 min.
Harald Appelshaeuser wrote on Tue, 10 August 2004 10:39 | I will organize an extra forum for chamber tests. I think it is very useful if people from time to time submit some of their results there.
|
Very good- thank you.
Regards
Sascha
|
|
|