GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » General » New version of DPM
New version of DPM [message #9312] Thu, 03 September 2009 16:14 Go to next message
Aida Galoyan is currently offline  Aida Galoyan
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2007
Location: Dubna
continuous participant
From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
Hi all,

I have commited new version of DPM generator.
Full elastic scattering, Coulomb, interference, hadronic parts are included in the new DPM.

You need to put the minimal angle of scattering -"tetmin"(>0) at DPM running, if you give value of parameter
"Elastic" = 1 (Inelastic with Elastic scatterings)
or = 2 (only Elastic scatterings).

The implementation of full elastic scattering in DPM is
important for Luminosity monitoring and, may be, for estimation of radiation doses in MVD.

Aida


Re: New version of DPM [message #9318 is a reply to message #9312] Thu, 03 September 2009 21:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mohammad Al-Turany is currently offline  Mohammad Al-Turany
Messages: 518
Registered: April 2004
Location: GSI, Germany
first-grade participant
From: *dip.t-dialin.net
Hi,

This change is also propagated to the PndDpmDirect class, i.e:

PndDpmDirect(Double_t Mom, Int_t Mode, Float_t tetmin=0)

The constructor of the PndDpmDirect has now an optional parameter tetmin. In case one choose elastic (Mode=1 or 2) and the theta is not set by user a warning will be printed out and the value is set to zero!

regards

Mohammad
Re: New version of DPM [message #9448 is a reply to message #9312] Thu, 24 September 2009 17:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Marius Mertens is currently offline  Marius Mertens
Messages: 55
Registered: January 2009
continuous participant
From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de
Hi Aida,

thanks for uploading the new DPMGen version!

I have a question regarding the cross sections for the different processes (to my understanding inelastic, strong elastic, coulomb elastic) you implemented.

When I generate a given number of events with DPMGen, requesting elastic and inelastic events at a fixed parameter set, how many of these events will be inelastic, strong elastic, coulomb elastic?

Additionally, I have the same question concerning the previous DPMGen version without coulomb interaction: For a fixed number of events, how many of them will be elastic and how many inelastic?

Best regards,

Marius
Re: New version of DPM [message #9452 is a reply to message #9312] Fri, 25 September 2009 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aida Galoyan is currently offline  Aida Galoyan
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2007
Location: Dubna
continuous participant
From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
Hi Marius,

please, send me your e-mail address,
and I can send you a version of programm codes
to receive information for cross-sections of
Coulomb, Interference and Hadron parts
of elastic scattering. There are some "print" operators
in fortran codes.

If I put corresponding "print"s
of your required values in fortran codes in current version DPM
and commit it,
it will be crushed, because option "lg2c" is removed
from "binmarke_Fortran.mk" file.

So, I can send you the needed files separately and explain how
to use them.

best regards, Aida

Re: New version of DPM [message #9454 is a reply to message #9452] Mon, 28 September 2009 11:59 Go to previous message
Marius Mertens is currently offline  Marius Mertens
Messages: 55
Registered: January 2009
continuous participant
From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de
Hi Aida,

thanks a lot! You should have received an email from me via the forum system in the meantime. If it didn't work for some reason, please let me know.

Marius
Previous Topic: Analyse MC hits per event in different detectors
Next Topic: Moving the Geometry from data file to the parameters
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 07 09:13:47 CEST 2022

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00683 seconds