GSI Forum
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » EMC » Separation of photon and electron
Separation of photon and electron [message #8478] Sat, 09 May 2009 21:04 Go to next message
donghee is currently offline  donghee
Messages: 385
Registered: January 2009
Location: Germnay
first-grade participant
From: *dip.t-dialin.net
Dear EMC experts,

I have a question about the PID of photon and electron with EMC.
I found a good article for electron PID based on the EMC information in the panda physics report.
but there are only electron, hadrons and muon separation with MLP training and Zernike moments.

E1/E9 or E9/E25 should be important variables for this purpose.
Could you teach me which values are relevant for photon PID or electron PID case?

Is there a global tracking class for photon or electron using only EMC?

Thank you in advance.
Donghee Kang
Re: Separation of photon and electron [message #8489 is a reply to message #8478] Mon, 11 May 2009 14:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bertram Kopf is currently offline  Bertram Kopf
Messages: 110
Registered: March 2006
continuous participant
From: *ep1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Dear Donghee,
Quote


I have a question about the PID of photon and electron with EMC.
I found a good article for electron PID based on the EMC information in the panda physics report.
but there are only electron, hadrons and muon separation with MLP training and Zernike moments.



the particle identification of electrons and photons are in principle two different things. Namely, before one should start with the EMC specific particle identification the matching of charged particle tracks with the EMC clusters/bumps has to be done. Those clusters which can be associated with charged tracks are assumed to be originated either from electrons, from charged hadrons or from muons. The EMC PID is discribed in the Panda PB exactly for this scenario. BTW: The most important info is E/p (the energy deposit of the cluster over the momentum of the charged particle).

For our PB studies we have assumed that all non-matched clusters are originated from a photons. And this was sufficient for our benchmark studies. But in priciple you are right that a proper photon identification is needed. Such clusters can also originated from neutrons, pi0's, electromagetic or hadronic split-offs. The shower shape informations are also here helpful properties for the distinctions between these (faked) particles.

Quote


E1/E9 or E9/E25 should be important variables for this purpose.
Could you teach me which values are relevant for photon PID or electron PID case?


There is a correlation between the Zernike-moments and E1/E9 and E9/E25. We trained the MLP with 10 different input properties. The advantage of using such a neural network is that it's not necessary to know how the properties are correlated.

Quote


Is there a global tracking class for photon or electron using only EMC?



For the PB studies we have defined a EmcCand object which has a reference to the cluster/bump object and to the track object (for the matched scenario). The PID has been done with PID specific packages.

Best regards,
Bertram.
Re: Separation of photon and electron [message #8491 is a reply to message #8478] Mon, 11 May 2009 15:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
donghee is currently offline  donghee
Messages: 385
Registered: January 2009
Location: Germnay
first-grade participant
From: *kph.uni-mainz.de
Dear Bertram,

Thank you for your nice explanation.
May I use such kind of EmcCand PID class based on the MLP, right now?
If yes, then where can I find it?

Best wishes,
Donghee





Re: Separation of photon and electron [message #8508 is a reply to message #8491] Mon, 11 May 2009 17:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bertram Kopf is currently offline  Bertram Kopf
Messages: 110
Registered: March 2006
continuous participant
From: *ep1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Hi Donghee,

donghee wrote on Mon, 11 May 2009 15:56


Thank you for your nice explanation.
May I use such kind of EmcCand PID class based on the MLP, right now?
If yes, then where can I find it?



What is explained in my last posting has been realized in the software code used for most of the PB benchmark studies. In PandaRoot the detector specific and global PID are still under development. I think that the PandaRoot experts for PID can better explain what you can use for your purposes right now.

Cheers,
Bertram.
Re: Separation of photon and electron [message #8511 is a reply to message #8478] Mon, 11 May 2009 20:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
donghee is currently offline  donghee
Messages: 385
Registered: January 2009
Location: Germnay
first-grade participant
From: *dip.t-dialin.net
Dear Bertram,

I understand well that the global PID is now not ready to use.
I have introduced lhetrack and EMC part in my analysis stuff for electron proton identification. Electons as a charged particle can relatively easy to detect in lhetrack class.
But for photon I think that EMC expert can only help for that in any case.

Quote:

I think that the PandaRoot experts for PID can better explain what you can use for your purposes right now.



If I choose only maximum cluster energy, that is suggested in EMC macro/emc, the reconstruction efficiency is simply not enough in the range from 0.1 to 4.5 GeV energy.

Thank you for your comment and help.
Donghee Kang
Re: Separation of photon and electron [message #8519 is a reply to message #8511] Tue, 12 May 2009 10:48 Go to previous message
M.Babai is currently offline  M.Babai
Messages: 46
Registered: January 2008
Location: Netherlands
continuous participant
From: *KVI.nl
Dear Donghee,

At this moment we are developing the global PID tools for PANDA and it is not finished yet. The task is partially implemented and one can use it, if you know how to train the different classifiers. Concerning the algorithms (MLP, KNN, BDT, ....) that are available, please have a look in the gpid directory.

Currently (untill the global data structure is ready to use) we are storing the output of classifiers in a self made object ("PndPidCand") that will disappear once the global one is available.

cheers,
Previous Topic: EMC geometry for theta 142 and 149 degree
Next Topic: Possible optimization of EMC data classes
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 28 09:20:57 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01111 seconds