GSI Forum: PANDA TOF » PANDA TOF FRRC meeting Moscow, April 2010

Home » PANDA » PANDA - Detector » PANDA TOF » PANDA TOF FRRC meeting Moscow, April 2010

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

PANDA TOF FRRC meeting Moscow, April 2010 [message #10465]

Wed, 24 March 2010 15:31

Carsten Schwarz
Messages: 288
Registered: March 2004

first-grade participant

From: *gsi.de

Dear colleages,

this mail reminds you of the FRRC meeting in Moscow, April 26th-28th, 2010 at ITEP.

Here, special the russian groups should have the platform to report about recent developments. Concerning the TOF recent progress on hardware/software is of interest. Of special interest in the barrel section is the mechanical setup and radiation length including infrasturcture, the weight, cables.

At the last collaboration meeting at GSI there was the request for a document decribing the physics case, technical benefits, and interaction with other detectors until the next collaboration meeting in Stockholm. We should discuss this in Moscow. If someone has suggestions we can discuss this also before Moscow.

Hope to see the Moscow and St.Petersburg TOF groups in Moscow
Best regards
Carsten

Report message to a moderator

Re: PANDA TOF FRRC meeting Moscow, April 2010 [message #10471 is a reply to message #10465]

Sun, 28 March 2010 18:30

Sasha Akindinov
Messages: 3
Registered: September 2009

occasional visitor

From: *cern.ch

Dear Carsten,
our group will actively participate and provide any help for organizing.
Could we have drawings (preliminary or even schematic) of support structure from DIRC I asked some time ago?
See you in Moscow Sasha Akindinov

Report message to a moderator

Re: PANDA TOF FRRC meeting Moscow, April 2010 [message #10472 is a reply to message #10471]

Mon, 29 March 2010 16:37

Carsten Schwarz
Messages: 288
Registered: March 2004

first-grade participant

From: *gsi.de

Hi Alexander,

better a schematic drawing now, than a elaborate CAD-Drawing in weeks: Find attached a drawing of the occupancy of the DIRC barboxes. That is our best knowledge now. However if there is a strong reason we need to change it. Consider it as a working basis.

Best regards
Carsten