 PandaRoot 2.0 [message #5229] |
Tue, 16 October 2007 17:49  |
Jens Sören Lange
Messages: 193
Registered: June 2005
|
first-grade participant |
From: *physik.uni-giessen.de
|
|
Dear all,
here are a few notes about what we decided concerning
PandaRoot 2.0 on the PandaRoot meeting Oct 20, 2007.
The tentative date for PandaRoot 2.0 release is Nov 7.
We decided, that the subdetector code for PandaRoot 2.0 should fulfill the following requirements:
1.) each subdetector should have the following existing data members
where XXX is the 3-letter acronym of the subdetector.
for single hit detectors XXX Digi
(e.g. DRC, TOF)
for cluster-type hit detectors XXXDigi and XXXCluster
(e.g. TPC, MVD, EMC etc.)
and an existing reconstruction to fill these structures.
The reconstruction can be preliminary (i.e. pre-amplifier, shaper, sampling frequencies etc.
which might not be the final, optimized values).
2.) In addition to the prelimnary reconstruction,
each detector should deliver a task for ideal reconstruction,
i.e. fill directly the XXXDigis and/or XXXCluster from XXXPoints.
3.) as documentation, each subdetector is asked to provide a diagram on the Wiki
with the names of classes and data members
see the example for MVD
http://forum.gsi.de/index.php?t=msg&th=1575&rid=326&S=67b64f 8f7aeff7dcdf4c2078b6bbec4f#msg_5211
4.) Each subdetector will have only one
contact person who will receive write permission
to the new /2_0_0 subversion branch, so that they might copy
the code once it achieves a status for 2.0.
The subversion repository path will be
https://subversion.gsi.de/fairroot/release/pandaroot/2_0_0
List of contact persons with write permissions:
Beampipe Stefano Spataro
DCH Aleksandra Wronska
DRC Annalisa Cecchi (tbc)
EMC Stefano Spataro
HYP Alicia Sanchez
Magnet Stefano Spataro
MVD Ralf Kliemt
STT Pablo Genova
TOF Alicia Sanchez
TPC Sebastian Neubert (tbc)
Annalisa and Sebastian, is it O.K. to put your names here as contact persons?
best regards, Soeren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: PandaRoot 2.0 [message #5248 is a reply to message #5245] |
Thu, 18 October 2007 13:14  |
Tobias Stockmanns
Messages: 489
Registered: May 2007
|
first-grade participant |
From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de
|
|
Hi Soeren,
this diagram is not up to date anymore, but MvdCluster would correspond to a point in 3-D space and is derived from CbmHit.
I am not very happy with this naming scheme. In my understanding the process of clustering means to find digis which belong to one hit. And a cluster is a collection of these digis. To get out of these cluster again a 3-D point I would call backmapping or reconstruction but not cluster.
Cheers,
Tobias
|
|
|
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
