GSI Forum: Bugs, Fixes, Releases

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » PandaRoot 2.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: PandaRoot 2.0 [message #5243 is a reply to message #5231]

Thu, 18 October 2007 11:18

Tobias Stockmanns
Messages: 489
Registered: May 2007

first-grade participant

From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de

Unfortunately I was not in Dubna, so can somebody please repeat the argument, why we should change our class names to PndXXX.

This is a significant amount of work and makes long class names even longer. We are already working in pandaRoot which clarifies, that this are not Cbm classes but panda ones.

Cheers,

Tobias

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		PandaRoot 2.0 By: Jens Sören Lange on Tue, 16 October 2007 17:49
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Aleksandra Wronska on Wed, 17 October 2007 12:30
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Sebastian Neubert on Wed, 17 October 2007 15:14
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Jens Sören Lange on Wed, 17 October 2007 20:25
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: asanchez on Thu, 18 October 2007 10:07
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Tobias Stockmanns on Thu, 18 October 2007 11:18
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Tobias Stockmanns on Thu, 18 October 2007 11:24
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Jens Sören Lange on Thu, 18 October 2007 11:45
		Re: PandaRoot 2.0 By: Tobias Stockmanns on Thu, 18 October 2007 13:14

Previous Topic:	ProcessHits() "not visible" while reading root geometry file
Next Topic:	Dashboard

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 30 07:58:05 CEST 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00756 seconds