GSI Forum: Tracking » WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation [message #8097 is a reply to message #8093]

Tue, 17 March 2009 10:21

Aleksandra Wronska
Messages: 38
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cracow

continuous participant

From: *if.uj.edu.pl

Dear Lia and Christian,

I have no objections about introducing _maxDistance in WirepointHitPolicy. It's the easiest solution, isn't it?

Concerning the origin of detPlane, the answer for now is "I do not know", I am afraid. I need a few hours to look for a reasonable solution for dch to use with a fixed plane origin. Any suggestions from Lia (as the original author of the code) are welcome Wink

What I have in mind (without a clear idea of implemenation yet) is that I could set the Z coordinate of the DchRecoHit2 (checking previously that it was not set before, such that the same code works for you, too) to the Z of poca on the wire, calculated with respect to the wire centre. Does it have any chance to work, Lia?
This would require an extra function for setting Z of a RecoHit, but that's a minor thing, isn't it?

cheers,
ola

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 13:55
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 14:16
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 15:42
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 15:54
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 16:16
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 16:49
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 18:31
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 18:46
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 16 March 2009 19:09
		new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:10
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 17 March 2009 18:13
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Anonymous Poster on Tue, 17 March 2009 18:23
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 11:51
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 18 March 2009 13:23
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 13:37
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:17
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:26
		Re: new in AbsTrackRep: extrapolateToLine and consequences on WirepointHitPolicy By: Lia Lavezzi on Wed, 18 March 2009 16:44
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 17 March 2009 10:21
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Tue, 17 March 2009 11:34
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 17 March 2009 11:53
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 16 March 2009 23:25
		changes in PndDchKalmanQA By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 15:32
		Re: changes in PndDchKalmanQA By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 16:13
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 18 March 2009 17:21
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 19 March 2009 13:35
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 14:11
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:42
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:54
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:56
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Thu, 19 March 2009 16:57
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 20 March 2009 12:58
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 14:36
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:11
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:18
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Fri, 20 March 2009 20:28
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:32
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Aleksandra Wronska on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:39
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 23 March 2009 14:01
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 23 March 2009 15:33
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Mon, 30 March 2009 16:21
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Aleksandra Wronska on Tue, 31 March 2009 08:16
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Anonymous Poster on Wed, 01 April 2009 12:34
		Re: WirepointHitPolicy detplane implementation By: Lia Lavezzi on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:55

Previous Topic:	Urgent fixes in FairGeanePro.cxx needed
Next Topic:	genfit LGPL

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Feb 25 12:15:33 CET 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00985 seconds