| g3Config.C [message #5351] |
Fri, 02 November 2007 09:47  |
Jens Sören Lange
Messages: 193
Registered: June 2005
|
first-grade participant |
From: *physik.uni-giessen.de
|
|
Dear all,
Florian brought up a maybe important point for the 2.0 release.
In combination with the geant the
gconfig/g3Config.C
was updated. See
http://forum.gsi.de/index.php?t=msg&th=1439&rid=0&S=bbde0129 2b20e2454231cc514702ac1c#msg_4722
in particular:
---
[...snip...]
which we have asked Rene Brun at Cern to update in the VMC cvs, and
the files:
in pandaroot
gconfig/Geane.C
gconfig/g3Config.C
[...snip...]
---
However, Florian noticed that the physics settings changed.
geant3->SetDCAY(1);
geant3->SetPAIR(1);
geant3->SetCOMP(1);
geant3->SetPHOT(1);
geant3->SetPFIS(0);
geant3->SetDRAY(1);
geant3->SetANNI(1);
geant3->SetBREM(1);
geant3->SetMUNU(1);
geant3->SetCKOV(1);
geant3->SetHADR(3);
geant3->SetLOSS(1);
geant3->SetMULS(1);
geant3->SetRAYL(1);
geant3->SetSTRA(1);
In the repository right now, the g3Config.C (and also you will find there a g3Config_new.C) have still the old settings, as they were during the whole year (because Florian did this intentionally for now). They are also consistent with Stefano's talk in
http://panda-wiki.gsi.de/pub/Computing/PresentationsCMMarc2007/20070326- GenovaSpataro.ppt
page 6
But maybe the new settings were also intentional?
(Andrea, could you please take a look?)
It means, we might have differences between g3 for PandaRoot 1.X and g3 for PandaRoot 2.X (now that maybe g3 and g4 hopefully are consistent, this keeps it interesting, and Stefano might enjoy to do many more comparisons ...).
So, can everyone please take a look if she/he thinks that the above settings are correct?
cheers, Soeren
|
|
|
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
