GSI Forum: MVD » Geometry

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » MVD » Geometry

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: MVD Development Discussion [message #4336 is a reply to message #4244]

Fri, 25 May 2007 10:11

Ralf Kliemt
Messages: 508
Registered: May 2007
Location: GSI, Darmstadt

first-grade participant

From: 141.30.85*

Hi Alicia,

You may think of strip detectors like Pixels with one column and several rows. In that way you even may arrange double-sided strip detectors by digitizing the same MC Point once with only one column and once with only one row.

The TST code is the approach from Tobias, now continued with the cad geometry. Since the Mvd has now two approaches (libMvd and libTst) there will be a simulation session in the Mvd subgroup meeting at Juelich (4.-5.6.07). After that we'll definately throw something away. So please don't get confused.

Kind regards, Ralf.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Geometry By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 15 May 2007 17:09
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 16 May 2007 09:37
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 22 May 2007 08:42
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: asanchez on Tue, 22 May 2007 10:56
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 22 May 2007 11:08
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: asanchez on Tue, 22 May 2007 11:16
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 22 May 2007 11:47
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Tobias Stockmanns on Tue, 22 May 2007 11:03
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: asanchez on Fri, 25 May 2007 09:22
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Ralf Kliemt on Fri, 25 May 2007 10:11
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: asanchez on Fri, 25 May 2007 10:16
		Re: MVD Development Discussion By: Tobias Stockmanns on Fri, 25 May 2007 10:53

Next Topic:

Root Geometry problems

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Mar 12 02:34:05 CET 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00861 seconds