ParticleGammaTime Information [message #20047] |
Wed, 07 December 2016 14:53 |
a_boso
Messages: 16 Registered: July 2014
|
occasional visitor |
From: *convergencegroup.co.uk
|
|
Dear all,
in the adapter.config file we have a Agata/ParticleGammaTime MhTDC processor. Its output is then sent to the Agata/Adapter processor.
However I noticed that only 20 informations are passed. But we have 22 detectors!
processor Agata/Adapter AGATA.AgataAdapter
crystal[0:179] <- AgataPsa.psa[0:179]
particle_gamma_time[04] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[0]
particle_gamma_time[05] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[1]
particle_gamma_time[18] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[2]
particle_gamma_time[19] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[3]
particle_gamma_time[20] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[4]
particle_gamma_time[21] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[5]
particle_gamma_time[22] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[6]
particle_gamma_time[23] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[7]
particle_gamma_time[15] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[10]
particle_gamma_time[16] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[11]
particle_gamma_time[17] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[12]
particle_gamma_time[37] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[17]
particle_gamma_time[13] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[18]
particle_gamma_time[14] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[19]
particle_gamma_time[39] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[20]
particle_gamma_time[40] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[21]
particle_gamma_time[41] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[22]
particle_gamma_time[42] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[23]
particle_gamma_time[43] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[24]
particle_gamma_time[44] <- Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[25]
Moreover looking at the spectra we don't have Agata/ParticleGammaTime.output[6] (and neither the corresponding crystal_id=22) information, but we have number 8,9 and 16, which are not passed to the adapter.
It looks we don't pass information about crystal_id 1,2,36. Which should be associated somehow to ParticleGammaTime number 8,9 and 16.
Does someone knows the reason of that and/or the correspondence between these values?
Thank you very much!!
Alberto
|
|
|