Re: MHTDC of the AgataTime crate [message #17948 is a reply to message #17700] |
Thu, 26 February 2015 12:18 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b744b/b744b6c95e7b6510c9ddb427561714cf627895bb" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
thuyuk
Messages: 68 Registered: July 2014
|
continuous participant |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff26a/ff26a18c948027c3d6c02058bab6c4bb2d5babcb" alt="tayfun.huyuk" From: *ific.uv.es
|
|
I just figured out that the reference signal from the Sci4.1 standard scintillator comes to AGATATimeCrate MHTDC module has some kind of reflection.
I checked the correlation of this signal with the Sci4.1 signal at USER crate MHTDC, and got the following plot:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08c19/08c19b82ae09e3f65b2bb0057c0568ca30872d46" alt="index.php?t=getfile&id=8295&private=0"
Where the x-axis and y-axis are the Sci4.1 at the USER crate and the AGATA time crate MHTDCs, respectively.
I would expect to see one "sharp" diagonal line in the perfect conditions, because this is just a comparison of the same signal that come from different modules. But, the reflection-like structure is clearly seen along the y-axis, which represents the Sci4.1 signal at the AGATA time crate MHTDC.
For those who put the time condition on the MHTDC might be interested in this information.
With this motivation, I started to use the Sci4.1 reference from the USER crate to get particle-gamma times from the AGATA crate. I suppose the whole setup is synchronized, therefore, I don't think that the use of the signals from different modules would create any complication. But, of course, a more experienced person who has better knowledge on the setup would confirm or disprove my assumption, and this would be very appreciated.
Cheers,
Tayfun
|
|
|