| [OK] Tracking parametrization [message #16271] |
Wed, 09 April 2014 10:37 |
Klaus Götzen
Messages: 293
Registered: June 2006
Location: GSI
|
first-grade participant |
From: *gsi.de
|
|
Hi,
I put now the sophisticated parametrization to the FsmSimpleTracker class with (reference to Susannas talk)
- dphi(p) according to p. 10
- dtheta(p) -> p. 9
- dp/p(p) -> p. 6
- for p<0.6: eff(p) -> p. 8.
They can be switched on by putting negative parameter values for pRes, thtRes, phiRes (the values given are then simply ignored if <0) and efficiency, where the efficiency is multiplied with a function shaped like that from p.8, scaling the eff value for 0<p<0.6 with a factor between 0.55 and 1.0.
However, from a quick check concerning the channels we discussed on Monday I observed, that a flat tracking efficiency of 85% already looks pretty good for 2pi, 4pi, and J/psi pi+ pi- channel. The eta_c ->phi phi channel is still inconstistent for both the sophisticated and the flat approach, where the flat values even look a bit more similar to full sim results, which is also true for the J/psi. In the figure, the red plots are from flat values, blue are from parametrization. In the J/psi plot, magenta corresponds to full sim. There the flat fast and full sim plots are basically identical with eff_trk = 85%.
So, our proposal is to keep the flat values as default.
Best,
Klaus
[Updated on: Fri, 12 September 2014 10:38] by Moderator Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
GSI Forum
Search
Help
Members
Login
Home
