GSI Forum: Tracking » PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT...

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT...

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT... [message #14632]

Thu, 18 April 2013 11:25

Simone Esch
Messages: 37
Registered: August 2010
Location: Forschungszentrum Jülich...

continuous participant

From: *ikp.kfa-juelich.de

Hello everyone,

I am using at the moment the PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal class to have an ideal track finding to fill the Kalman track fitter class.
Due the checking I saw that tracks with MVD and GEM hits, but without STT hits are ruled out for some reason.

I have several tracks which have a shallow angle and therefore don't hit the STT, but still the MVD disks and the GEM stations.

Is there a special reason to rule them out? Is it possible to make this ruling out selectable with a flag which can be set by the macro?

Thank you

best regards

Simone

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT... By: Simone Esch on Thu, 18 April 2013 11:25
		Re: PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT... By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 18 April 2013 11:33
		Re: PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT... By: Simone Esch on Thu, 18 April 2013 11:43
		Re: PndSttMvdGemTrackingIdeal: Tracks with MVD and GEM, but without STT... By: StefanoSpataro on Thu, 18 April 2013 11:47

Previous Topic:	Check of GENFIT effects on reconstructed barrel tracks
Next Topic:	GEANE verbosity flag

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Feb 12 11:29:59 CET 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00753 seconds