GSI Forum: Bugs, Fixes, Releases » [FIXED] Real vs. Ideal Tracking

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » [FIXED] Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? [message #14596 is a reply to message #14594]

Tue, 09 April 2013 07:55

Klaus Götzen
Messages: 293
Registered: June 2006
Location: GSI

first-grade participant

From: *gsi.de

Hi Stefano,

did you use evtgen->SetStoreTree() in simulation? If not, the mc matcher cannot do composites correctly.

You could also try with

mcm.SetType(dplus, 411)

to be independent of any naming scheme. Just to mention, charged conjugates are not automatically set, so you need to set the type for D+ and D- separately.

Best,
Klaus

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[FIXED] Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: Ralf Kliemt on Mon, 08 April 2013 10:15
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 08 April 2013 12:43
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: Ralf Kliemt on Mon, 08 April 2013 13:05
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: Gianluigi Boca on Mon, 08 April 2013 15:06
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 08 April 2013 15:26
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 08 April 2013 23:01
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: Klaus Götzen on Tue, 09 April 2013 07:55
		Re: Real vs. Ideal Tracking - Ghosts? By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 09 April 2013 21:02

Previous Topic:	[FIXED] Detector geometry is not visualized inside the FairBaseParSet Container
Next Topic:	[FIXED] eventdisplay does not load on Fedora 18

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jul 22 01:18:08 CEST 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00737 seconds