GSI Forum: Tracking » Eta

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Tracking » Eta_c efficiency

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Eta_c efficiency [message #12818 is a reply to message #12817]

Mon, 28 November 2011 17:43

StefanoSpataro
Messages: 2736
Registered: June 2005
Location: Torino

first-grade participant

From: *30-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it

Considering that the efficiency is something like 20%, there should be no empty files. In such a case, maybe the reconstruction macros had some problems and have created a tree with no entry, without giving an error. The subjob is simply failing and it should not be counted in the 70000 statistics.
But I don't know if this can happen.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Eta_c efficiency By: Gianluigi Boca on Fri, 25 November 2011 19:20
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: Dima Melnychuk on Sun, 27 November 2011 23:27
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: Dima Melnychuk on Mon, 28 November 2011 12:43
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 28 November 2011 16:05
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: Dima Melnychuk on Mon, 28 November 2011 17:14
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: StefanoSpataro on Mon, 28 November 2011 17:43
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: Dima Melnychuk on Tue, 29 November 2011 14:43
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: Gianluigi Boca on Tue, 29 November 2011 15:42
		Re: Eta_c efficiency By: StefanoSpataro on Tue, 29 November 2011 15:54

Previous Topic:	eta_c reconstruction efficiency
Next Topic:	Deterministic Annealing Filter and Kalman

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Sep 17 09:55:07 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00696 seconds