GSI Forum: Bugs, Fixes, Releases » First results of TPC code profiling

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Bugs, Fixes, Releases » First results of TPC code profiling

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: First results of TPC code profiling [message #11421 is a reply to message #11419]

Sat, 08 January 2011 11:32

Felix Boehmer
Messages: 149
Registered: May 2007
Location: Munich

first-grade participant

From: *adsl.alicedsl.de

Hi Stefano,

I first tried to use TMemStat, but for some reason I could not even get it to work. I hoped that in this way I would be able to directly associate events and memory consumption.

The plot you see was created with the google performance tools and pprof. It works by replacing the normal libcmalloc for the program you want to examine, thus enabling heap analysis. This can be done by a LD_PRELOAD environment variable, so no re-compiling or re-linking is necessary.

However, it takes a while...

I have not tried DPM yet simply for time reasons. The generator used will of course not change the task behavior. But I do believe that with DPM you will get a lot more TPC objects (all the slow protons!) and will probably run into these kind of memory problems much quicker / more often.

I hope I could help to at least make things a little clearer.

Cheers,

Felix

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		First results of TPC code profiling By: Felix Boehmer on Thu, 30 December 2010 16:01
		Re: First results of TPC code profiling By: Florian Uhlig on Fri, 31 December 2010 10:02
		Re: First results of TPC code profiling By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 07 January 2011 13:58
		Re: First results of TPC code profiling By: Felix Boehmer on Sat, 08 January 2011 11:32
		Re: First results of TPC code profiling By: StefanoSpataro on Wed, 09 February 2011 14:01

Previous Topic:	Pandaroot crash due to TParticlePDG.h
Next Topic:	error while making pandaroot

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 11 10:41:09 CEST 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00944 seconds