GSI Forum: Event Generators » New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations

Home » PANDA » PandaRoot » Event Generators » New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations [message #10120 is a reply to message #10118]

Fri, 05 February 2010 15:58

Tobias Stockmanns
Messages: 489
Registered: May 2007

first-grade participant

From: *netcologne.de

Just in short, why this was introduced:

The cross section for elastic scattering diverges for low scattering angles. Therefore you need to have a cut-off parameter (theta) to define down to which angles you want to simulate it.

The new version of DPM was introduced because there was no EM elastic scattering in the old version but this is needed for the luminosity monitor which relys on this effect to calculate the luminosity.

I hope this helps a bit.

Cheers,

Tobias

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Tue, 02 February 2010 17:55
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Ralf Kliemt on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:14
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:38
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Tobias Stockmanns on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:48
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Wed, 03 February 2010 16:53
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 10:33
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 11:07
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Sebastian Neubert on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:01
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:02
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 12:08
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 14:36
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 15:43
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Tobias Stockmanns on Fri, 05 February 2010 15:58
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Felix Boehmer on Fri, 05 February 2010 16:09
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: StefanoSpataro on Fri, 05 February 2010 17:07
		Re: New DPMgen results disagree with earlier simulations By: Aida Galoyan on Fri, 05 February 2010 18:37

Previous Topic:	Random Seed of BoxGenerator
Next Topic:	UrQMD - SMM

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Oct 05 10:40:47 CEST 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00852 seconds